Thursday, May 17, 2012

Updates related to Harvey's book Three Felonies a Day, a critical take on the Justice Department

Archive by Years

Harvey on Nightside with Dan Rea, Originally Broadcast May 11th, 2012

Last week I stopped by the WBZ radio program Nightside with Dan Rea to talk about a seemingly unimportant piece of legislation, the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act, which had been passed with overwhelming bipartisan support last March. While the act's title implies that it is dedicated to improving the landscaping around federal buildings, Dan and I discuss how the new law has real freedom of speech implications: it represents unprecedented restrictions on protests near those under secret service protection. As we have learned over the years, laws are often not what they seem...

NACDL Podcast Audio Available

This week I was a guest on NACDL's weekly podcast, "The Criminal Docket," where Mary Price and I discussed the overcriminalization crisis that has plagued America for the past three decades. It was a wide-ranging discussion of the causes, effects and possible solutions to the vast proliferation of vague statutes and overzealous prosecutions at the federal level. You can find the full audio of the podcast on iTunes, or by clicking here.



The Economist cites TFD in extensive article on U.S. incarceration


One of the many sobering subtexts to Three Felonies a Day is that the U.S. has the highest rate of incarceration in the civilized world. The Economist shines a bright light on this phenomenon in its current issue, and highlights the role that vague statutes play in this prosecution mill.

The system has three big flaws, say criminologists. First, it puts too many people away for too long. Second, it criminalises acts that need not be criminalised. Third, it is unpredictable. Many laws, especially federal ones, are so vaguely written that people cannot easily tell whether they have broken them.

The article also highlights an often under-appreciated aspect of the overburdened prison system: the stacked deck against criminal defendants, where a guilty plea seems like an offer even an innocent cannot refuse.

Innocent defendants may plead guilty in return for a shorter sentence to avoid the risk of a much longer one. A prosecutor can credibly threaten a middle-aged man that he will die in a cell unless he gives evidence against his boss. This is unfair, complains Harvey Silverglate, the author of “Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent”. If a defence lawyer offers a witness money to testify that his client is innocent, that is bribery. But a prosecutor can legally offer something of far greater value—his freedom—to a witness who says the opposite. The potential for wrongful convictions is obvious.

The full article is must-read; click here to view it on economist.com.


[End of post]

New York Times cites TFD in article on criminal justice reform


In a front-page article in today's New York Times, Supreme Court correspondent Adam Liptak writes about how former ideological adversaries are uniting under the banner of criminal justice reform. Conservatives, libertarians, and liberals have all found common ground in seeing the dangers of overcriminalization, Liptak writes, citing Three Felonies a Day as an example.

Harvey A. Silverglate, a left-wing civil liberties lawyer in Boston, says he has been surprised and delighted by the reception that his new book, “Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent,” has gotten in conservative circles. (A Heritage Foundation official offered this reporter a copy.)

The book argues that federal criminal law is so comprehensive and vague that all Americans violate it every day, meaning prosecutors can indict anyone at all.

Read more to view a PDF of the NYT print edition in your browser.

On 'Honest Services' Fraud case, New York Times columnist quotes TFD


Today's New York Times features an article on a federal law that typifies the problem laid out in Three Felonies a Day. Known as "Honest Services" Fraud, this elastic, 28-word statute has been used by U.S. Attorneys to criminalize all manner and kind of activity, ranging from political corruption to sharp-elbowed business practices. What the Supreme Court will soon decide, Adam Liptak writes, is whether the law is unconstitutionally vague. My take: It unquestionably is.

The honest services law is but one example of what Harvey A. Silverglate, a civil liberties lawyer in Boston, calls “an over-criminalization problem.” His new book, “Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent,” argues that the average American professional unwittingly commits several serious crimes each day.

“Even the most intelligent and informed citizen (including lawyers and judges, for that matter),” Mr. Silverglate writes, “cannot predict with any reasonable assurance whether a wide range of seemingly ordinary activities might be regarded by federal prosecutors as felonies.”

[End of post]

Minimize

Home   |   About   |   Contact   |   Books   |   The SilvergLatest   |   Publications
Copyright 2011